Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Shekhar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21483 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention of the petitioner to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after it has been filed and is pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21483 of 2026

                                    Shekhar
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak     Kumar     Srivastava,
                                                                Deepanshi Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Singh, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.