Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NASIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Nasir and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21579 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought its withdrawal. The learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioners' clear intention to abandon the proceedings and the lack of any objection from the respondents. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The judgment was pronounced on 30 September 2026 by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh‑I.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed on the petitioner's request for withdrawal when the respondent does not object?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21579 of 2026

                                    Nasir And Another
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Ajay Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not
                                    intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.