Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. LAJJAWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

Petitioner Smt. Lajjawati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation that had already concluded with a final report favoring the accused on 02-09-2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate confirmed the final report and noted that the investigation was complete. The petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating no objection to approaching the appropriate forum later if needed. The State's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after the investigation has concluded?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • investigation report

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21613 of 2026

                                    Smt. Lajjawati
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         :   Jay Singh Yadav, Priti Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a
                                    final report has been forwarded in favour of the accused persons
                                    on 02.09.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the
                                    appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                    4. Learned AGA has no objection to the same.

                                    5. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
                                    with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.