Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VINOD CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Vinod Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the State counsel informed the Court that additional, more serious charges had been added to the case. The petitioner acknowledged this development but expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and obtain permission to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The Court accepted the petitioner's request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, and granted liberty to file a new petition. Certified copies of the documents were ordered to be returned to the petitioner's counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending writ petition and be granted liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • fresh petition
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                          CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21978 of 2026

                                    Vinod Chauhan
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                   Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Yadav, Veer Pratap
                                                                Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that
                                    in the instant case, during investigation, certain graver sections has
                                    further been added.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid
                                    fact but states that he does not intend to press the petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the
                                    counsel for the petitioner as per Rules.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Sanjeet
                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.