Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHASHWAT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Shashwat Pandey, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22123 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent counsel and the Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No merits of the petition were considered, and the case was closed without any order on the substantive issues.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22123 of 2026

                                    Shashwat Pandey
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anant Prakash Mishra, Suneel
                                                                Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arunesh Kumar Singh, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Shri Arunesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.