Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM ASHISH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Ram Ashish and four others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioners' request and the lack of opposition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 29 September 2026 by Judges Devendra Singh‑I and Rajiv Gupta.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and without objection from the respondents

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22800 of 2026

                                    Ram Ashish And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Sonu Kumar Upadhyay, Vishnu Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Abrendra Patel, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State,
                                    Sri Abrendra Patel, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and perused the
                                    record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 4 has no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    KU

                                                                      (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.