Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAKESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail the statutory alternative remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesk Shukla, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22805 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and wanted to withdraw it, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate statutory remedy. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioner’s clear intention and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to avail the alternative statutory remedy. The Court also ordered the return of the certified copy of the relevant documents to the petitioner’s counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn after filing
  • Whether the Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory alternative remedy

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • statutory remedy
  • Allahabad High Court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22805 of 2026

                                    Rakesh Shukla
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to avail the statutory
                                    alternative remedy as available to him under the law.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to counsel for
                                    the petitioner as per Rules.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    S. Singh
                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.