Allahabad High Court
RUKHSAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order is vacated.
Summary
Petitioners Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the Court to address the matter, although the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court examined the lack of prosecution of the petition. It held that the petition could not proceed without the petitioners' participation and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioners?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22876 of 2026
Rukhsar And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioners to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the
State is present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…