Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

IBRAHIM KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioners Ibrahim Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The dismissal was recorded on September 23, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of petitioner counsel?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23041 of 2026

                                    Ibrahim Khan And 2 Others
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Avanish Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
                                    petitioners to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State is present.

                                    2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
                                    of prosecution.

                                    3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Saurabh




Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.