Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GAGAN KUMAR SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Gagan Kumar Singhal, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23062 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Eishan Mehta, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The Court, comprising Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Tarun Saxena, granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23062 of 2026

                                    Gagan Kumar Singhal
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :    Eishan Mehta
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Mr. Eishan Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
                                    petitioner, after some length of arguments, prayed for leave to
                                    withdraw the present writ petition.


                                    2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by
                                    learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Saurabh




Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.