Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NISHANT TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Nishant Tomar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13 September 2026. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal proceedings
  • high court
  • charge sheet

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23138 of 2026

                                    Nishant Tomar
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Hemendra Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for
                                         the State.

                                         2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the
                                         instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a
                                         charge sheet has been forwarded against the petitioner on
                                         13.9.2026.

                                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                         aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                         petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach
                                         appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                         4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                         withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.



                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    R




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.