Allahabad High Court
VIPIN SINGH @ VIPPA PARIHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 2578 of 2026) was filed by Vipin Singh @ Vippa Parihar against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The interim order, if any, was vacated. The dismissal was based solely on the petitioner's failure to appear and prosecute the writ.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2578 of 2026
Vipin Singh @ Vippa Parihar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Other
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. Learned AGA for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
September 9, 2026 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
C. MANI
Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRAMANI VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…