Allahabad High Court
KADIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25861 of 2025 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court held that the petition could not proceed in the absence of any representation by the petitioner and dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The dismissal was recorded on 9 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be entertained and proceed in the absence of any petitioner representation?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 25861 of 2025
Kadir
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. Learned AGA for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
September 9, 2026 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
C. MANI
Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRAMANI VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…