Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHOLA SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

Petitioners Bhola Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the request and, finding no objection from the respondents, accepted the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner withdraws it during the hearing

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2947 of 2026

                                    Bhola Sharma And 2 Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Jitendra Rpasad Kushwaha, Radheshyam
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A., Sarvesh Chaubey

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and
                                    Sri Sarvesh Chaubey, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused
                                    the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. In view of the statement made above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    ss
                                                                     (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.