Allahabad High Court
JATINDER URF JITENDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The writ petition filed by Jatinder Urf Jitendra was listed before the High Court of Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional Government Advocate and counsel for one respondent were present. The Court observed the absence of the petitioner’s representation and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was vacated. The order was pronounced by Judges Tarun Saxena and Chandra Dhari Singh on 16 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner’s counsel?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3685 of 2025
Jatinder Urf Jitendra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.C.Srivastava, Subham Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra Tiwari, G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the State
and Mr. Surendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4
are present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 16, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…