Allahabad High Court
SEEMA PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERY
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Seema Pandey filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3914 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and four others. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court, while the respondent's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed that the petition could not be proceeded with in the absence of the petitioner’s prosecution. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. Additionally, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be entertained and proceed in the absence of the petitioner’s representation or prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3914 of 2025
Seema Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union Of India And 4 Othery
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Nisth Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manoj Kumar Singh
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the State
is present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 16, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…