Allahabad High Court
RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4443 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court noted the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The dismissal was pronounced by a bench of Hon’ble Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Tarun Saxena on 16 September 2026.
Issues considered
- The petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4443 of 2025
Ramesh Chandra Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Abhishek, Pratibha Mishra,
Rajrshi Gupta, Sudhanshu Kumar, Sr.
Advocate
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. Learned AGA for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 16, 2026
Atul
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…