Allahabad High Court
BHOLA NATH SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Bhola Nath Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and the respondent's counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, finding no opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What procedural requirements apply to the withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing?
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5056 of 2026
Bhola Nath Sharma And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Rpasad Kushwaha, Radheshyam
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sarvesh Chaubey
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, Sri
Sarvesh Chaubey, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the
record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to
withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the respondent no.4 have no
objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
May 7, 2026
ss
(Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…