Allahabad High Court
DEEPAK JAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners Deepak Jain and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to address the court, although the Attorney General for the State was present. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief that had been granted earlier was vacated. The dismissal was pronounced by a bench of two judges on 16 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should proceed in the absence of any petitioner representation.
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5300 of 2025
Deepak Jain And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijit Saxena
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioners to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the
State is present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 16, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…