Allahabad High Court
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the absence of representation for the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The order was pronounced by Judges Tarun Saxena and Chandra Dhari Singh on September 18, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6083 of 2025
Prabhat Kumar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shobhit Pratap Singh
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the State
is present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3.Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 18, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…