Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ZAINUL AABEDEEN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Zainul Aabedeen and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6695 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and counsel for respondent No. 3 raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, finding no opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and during the pendency of the case.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6695 of 2026

                                    Zainul Aabedeen And 2 Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of Up And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :    Rakesh Kumar Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :    Amiruddin Siddique, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                         HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State, Mr. Amiruddin Siddique, learned counsel appearing on
                                    behalf of respondent no. 3 and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing on
                                    behalf of respondent no. 3 have no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                     (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    Brijesh Maurya




Digitally signed by :-
BRIJESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.