Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UPENDRA KUMAR PRAJAPATI ALIAS RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar Prajapati, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6711 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondent

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6711 of 2026

                                    Upendra Kumar Prajapati Alias Raja
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Dinesh Kumar Maurya, Ram Raj
                                                                      Prajapati
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.


                                                                 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    KU




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.