Allahabad High Court
SAJJAD KHAN @ SAJJAD AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State and the counsel for the third respondent raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the unopposed request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has voluntarily withdrawn it and there is no objection from the respondents.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- High Court
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6716 of 2026
Sajjad Khan @ Sajjad Ahmad And 3 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Pravesh Yadav, Shashank Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Hari Om Gupta, Virendra Singh
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State,
Sri Nasir Hussain holding brief of Sri Hari Om Gupta, learned counsel for
respondent No. 3 and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 3 has no
objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
May 5, 2026
KU
Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…