Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TAYUB @ TAIYAB MASOOD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report had been submitted. The petitioners did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating they would approach the appropriate forum later if needed. The court considered the petitioners' request to withdraw. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after the investigation has concluded

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6729 of 2026

                                    Tayub @ Taiyab Masood And 4 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                        :    Rakesh Pathak
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                        :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the police report
                                    has been forwarded.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts
                                    but states the he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate
                                    stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                                                  (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    RPD




Digitally signed by :-
RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.