Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHIVAM @ SHUBHAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the unopposed request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and without opposition

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • procedural law
  • high court jurisdiction
  • criminal miscellaneous writ

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7336 of 2026

                                    Shivam @ Shubham And 2 Others
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Ali Hasan, Ram Murti Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   Akhilesh Kumar Ojha, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no. 3 and learned A.G.A.

                                    2.After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.
                                    3 has no objection.

                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.




                                                                 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    R




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.