Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SWETA GAUTAMversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

Sweta Gautam filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7342 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of a criminal investigation in which a charge sheet had already been filed against her. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was concluded and a charge sheet was forwarded. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the procedural posture of the case. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum when necessary.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request
  • Whether the Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • withdrawal
  • charge sheet
  • liberty to approach
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7342 of 2026

                                    Sweta Gautam
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus
                                    The State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :   Shivam Kumar Modanwal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
                                         AGA for the State.

                                         2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in
                                         the instant case, the investigation has already been
                                         concluded and a charge sheet has been forwarded against
                                         the petitioner.

                                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                         aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this
                                         writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to
                                         approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                         4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                         withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.


                                    May 5, 2026
                                    R
                                                                     (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.