Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHARDA GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' request and the lack of objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and what procedural steps are required

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7344 of 2026

                                    Sharda Gupta And 4 Others
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Ankaj Kumar Pal, Sunil Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : Ajay Kumar Singh Yadav, Anil Kumar
                                                                     Srivastava, Brij Kumar Yadav, G.A.,
                                                                     Nagina Singh Yadav, Ram Sagar
                                                                     Yadav

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Brij Kumar
                                    Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned
                                    A.G.A.

                                    2.After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.
                                    3 has no objection.

                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.




                                                                 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    R




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.