Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MONTI @ RAVIRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Monti @ Raviraj Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that more serious charges had been added to the investigation. The petitioner’s counsel then informed the Court that he did not wish to pursue the present petition and would instead file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The Court accepted this statement and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file a new petition. The certified copy of the petition file was ordered to be returned to the petitioner’s counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural dismissal
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7399 of 2026

                                    Monti @ Raviraj Singh
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :    Rajesh Kumar Maddheshiya
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case
                                    during the course of investigation, certain graver sections have further been
                                    added.

                                    3. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at
                                    the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks to withdraw it
                                    with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to counsel for the
                                    petitioner as per Rules.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                  (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.