Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SATYAPAL YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Petitioners Satyapal Yadav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7403 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) representing the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the parties' positions, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted the petitioners liberty to file a new petition. The Court also ordered that the certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to the petitioners' counsel as per the Rules.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7403 of 2026

                                    Satyapal Yadav And Another
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Sanjeev Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to counsel for the
                                    petitioners as per Rules.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                  (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.