Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KANHANIYA INDENE GAS SERVICEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Kanhaniya Indene Gas Service, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced at the Bar that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the mutual consent, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after it has been filed?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8085 of 2026

                                    Kanhaniya Indene Gas Service
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Naveen Kumar Yadav, Pradeep Kumar
                                                                      Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement
                                    at Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw
                                    it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                      (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.