Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIVEK YADAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, confirming that a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition when no objection is raised by the respondents.

Summary

The petitioner, Vivek Yadav, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition (No. 8098 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent’s Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court examined the request and, finding no opposition, allowed the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after it has been filed and is pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8098 of 2026

                                    Vivek Yadav
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         :    Arun Kumar Yadav, Yogendra Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    ss
                                                                     (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.