Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HAMBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Hambir Singh, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8099 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Additional Government Advocate (AGA) representing the State raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The Court examined the record, noted the unopposed request, and proceeded to dismiss the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and after the matter is listed for hearing.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8099 of 2026

                                    Hambir Singh
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Deepak Kumar Singh, Shishir Kumar
                                                                      Singh, Vinanjay Kumar Patel
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    ss
                                                                     (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.