Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JARISHA KHATOON AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Jarisha Khatoon and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Rajiv Sisodia, announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The counsel for respondent No. 3 and the Advocate General for the State raised no objection to this request. The Court considered the withdrawal request and, finding no opposition, ordered the dismissal of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on April 30, 2026.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8168 of 2026

                                    Jarisha Khatoon And 3 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Rajiv Sisodia
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, Sri
                                    Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned AGA for the State
                                    have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
                                    April 30, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                      (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.