Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHAKTI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

Petitioners Shakti Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after the investigation had been completed and a charge-sheet filed on 06-04-2026. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that the investigation was concluded and the charge-sheet was already submitted. Petitioners did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating they would approach the appropriate forum later if needed. The Court considered the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage. The dismissal was recorded on 07-05-2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition when the petitioners seek to withdraw it after the investigation is concluded?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ
  • criminal procedure
  • charge-sheet
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8174 of 2026

                                    Shakti Singh And 2 Others
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Yadav,        Bhoodev     Yadav,
                                                                Shivam Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out
                                    that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded
                                    and the charge-sheet has been forwarded on 06.04.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the
                                    appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.