Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAHUL PRASAD @ RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Rahul Prasad filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8453 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Arvind Prabodh Dubey, later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and that he no longer wished to pursue the relief. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal of the petition. The court, after noting the petitioner's intention to abandon the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive legal issues were examined, and the dismissal was recorded as the final order of the court.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • infructuous
  • withdrawal of petition

Judgment

                                                      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                       CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8453 of 2026

                                    Rahul Prasad @ Rahul Kumar
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Arvind Prabodh Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                          HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
                                                          HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    Shri Om Prakash, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Arvind
                                    Prabodh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
                                    the writ petition has become infructuous and the petitioner does
                                    not wish to press the same.

                                    The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

                                    Shri Lal Bihari Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No.4
                                    is present.


                                                                      (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
                                    September 14, 2026
                                    Ashish Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.