Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Arif Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent’s Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioner’s clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondent

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8567 of 2026

                                    Arif Khan
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Alok Tripathi, Deepak Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that the petitioner does not intend to press this
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Dhirendra/




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.