Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MANGAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Mangal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after a charge sheet had been filed against him. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage. The Court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum in the future.

Issues considered

  • The Court may dismiss a criminal writ petition when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it after a charge sheet has been filed.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8569 of 2026

                                    Mangal Singh
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :   Brijesh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :   G.A., Rafat Raza Khan

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                          HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                          HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel
                                         for respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the State.

                                         2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in
                                         the instant case, the investigation has already been
                                         concluded and a charge sheet has been forwarded against
                                         the petitioner.

                                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                         aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this
                                         writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to
                                         approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                         4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                         withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.


                                    May 6, 2026
                                    R
                                                                       (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.