Allahabad High Court
SURENDRAPAL SHARMA @ SURENDRA PAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn because the petitioners, with no objection from the respondent, chose to withdraw it.
Summary
The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8574 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The Assistant Government Advocate (AGA) for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, having no opposition, allowed the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners at the stage of hearing and, if so, what procedural effect follows?
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction
- high court practice
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8574 of 2026
Surendrapal Sharma @ Surendra Pal And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyavrat Tripathi, Virendra Prakash
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rajiv Sisodia
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ
petition and seeks to withdraw it.
2. Learned AGA has no objection.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
May 6, 2026
R
(Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…