Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Shani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the unopposed request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural disposition when a petitioner voluntarily withdraws a writ petition and the respondent does not object?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • procedural dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8589 of 2026

                                    Shani
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Sarthak Singh, Vimlesh Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.


                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    KU




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.