Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SAPNA @ RINKI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13-11-2025. Petitioners did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The Court considered the petitioners' request and, finding no objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the liberty sought. The dismissal leaves the pending criminal proceedings unaffected.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court
  • charge sheet

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8657 of 2026

                                    Sapna @ Rinki And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ravindra Prakash Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Shravan
                                                                      Kumar Yadav

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, Sri
                                    Shravan Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and perused
                                    the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, investigation has already been concluded and a charge sheet has
                                    also been forwarded against the petitioners on 13.11.2025.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts
                                    but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate
                                    stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.


                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.