Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KUNAL SINGHAL AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioners Kunal Singhal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the police investigation and report filed on 01.04.2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and the police report had been submitted. The petitioners did not contest these facts and expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later if needed. The court considered the petitioners' request to withdraw the proceeding. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after the investigation is concluded

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court
  • investigation concluded

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8684 of 2026

                                    Kunal Singhal And 2 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    The State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Neeraj Tripathi, Raj Kumar Kesari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the police report
                                    has also been forwarded against the petitioner on 01.04.2026.
                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but
                                    states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw
                                    it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.