Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM NARESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to this request. The Court, noting the unopposed withdrawal, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 7 May 2026 by Judges Rajiv Gupta and Dr. Ajay Kumar‑II.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws it and there is no objection from the respondents

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8781 of 2026

                                    Ram Naresh And 2 Others
                                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                            Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Rahul Saxena
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   G.A., Kuldeep Johri, Sonu Nirmal

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                           HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                           HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, Sri Kuldeep
                                    Johri, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at Bar
                                    that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the State have no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                               (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.