Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PRADYUMN GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Pradyumn Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State had already completed investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 12-11-2025. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed his intention to withdraw the petition and seek relief in the appropriate forum later. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after a charge sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • charge sheet
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8787 of 2026

                                    Pradyumn Gupta
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Vikalp Kumar Rai, Vivek Chaturvedi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case,
                                    investigation has already been concluded and a charge sheet has been
                                    forwarded against the petitioner on 12.11.2025.

                                    3. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid fact but states that he does not intend to press this petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at
                                    appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.


                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    KU




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.