Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Arshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8795 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel (the Advocate General) raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the unopposed withdrawal, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner voluntarily seeks withdrawal and the respondent does not object.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8795 of 2026

                                    Arshad
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :     Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.


                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    KU




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.