Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHARAT BHUSHAN TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Bharat Bhushan Tyagi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the consent of both parties, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn after filing with the consent of the parties

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8798 of 2026

                                    Bharat Bhushan Tyagi
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         :     Jitendra Kumar, Ritesh Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement
                                    at Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw
                                    it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Monika
                                                                      (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MONIKA KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.