Allahabad High Court
RAHUL YADAV @ JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn because the petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the writ.
Summary
The petitioner, Rahul Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8808 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and wanted to withdraw it, reserving the right to approach another forum if needed. The Court considered the counsel’s statement and the petitioner’s intention to withdraw the proceedings. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach an appropriate forum in the future.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- high court procedure
- petition dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8808 of 2026
Rahul Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhinav Trivedi, Adarsh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with the liberty to approach
appropriate forum.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.
(Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
April 23, 2026
R
Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…