Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHD. AKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Mohd. Akram filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8817 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded its investigation and forwarded a charge sheet against the petitioner on 5 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel, did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The learned Additional Government Advocate confirmed the charge sheet and the status of the investigation. The Court, noting the petitioner's request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the liberty sought. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn after a charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • charge sheet

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8817 of 2026

                                    Mohd. Akram
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :   Pranjal Singh, Ram Kumar Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                          HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                          HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
                                         AGA for the State.

                                         2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in
                                         the instant case, the investigation has already been
                                         concluded and a charge sheet has been forwarded against
                                         the petitioner on 5.12.2025.

                                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                         aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this
                                         writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to
                                         approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                         4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                         withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.


                                    May 7, 2026
                                    R
                                                                       (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.