Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Asha Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8832 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondents, including the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any opposition from the respondents. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner expressly seeks withdrawal and the respondents do not object

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • High Court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8832 of 2026

                                    Asha Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ankit Rai, Rajeev Giri
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Poonam Maurya, G.A., Om Prakash
                                                                      Prajapati, Pradeep Kumar

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Om Prakash Prajapati,
                                    learned counsel for respondent no. 4, learned A.G.A. for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that the petitioner does not intend to press this
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA and learned counsel for respondent no. 4 have no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Dhirendra/




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.