Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MUKESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Mukesh Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition. It held that a petition may be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws it without objection. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioner?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8835 of 2026

                                    Mukesh Sharma
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Ravindra Pratap Singh, Vishal Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Avinash Kumar Sharma, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Avinash Kumar Sharma,
                                    learned counsel for respondent no. 4, learned A.G.A. for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that the petitioner does not intend to press this
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA and learned counsel for respondent no. 4 have no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Dhirendra/




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.