Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHRUTI MISHRA ALIAS ALKA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Shruti Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that she had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking to withdraw it. The respondent State and the other respondents did not object to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The petition was therefore closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after being arrested

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8857 of 2026

                                    Shruti Mishra Alias Alka Mishra
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Chandra Kumar Rai, Girish Kumar
                                                                      Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Kunal Shah, Devraj Pathak, G.A.,
                                                                      Utkarsh Tiwari

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and
                                    Sri Satish Kumar Mishra, holding brief of Sri Utkarsh Tiwari, learned
                                    counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement
                                    at the Bar that the petitioner has already been arrested by the police and, as
                                    such, he does not intend to further press this petition and seeks to withdraw
                                    it.

                                    3. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the respondent no.4 have no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    ss
                                                                     (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.